thedodger

http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2011/01/0...801_ntnews.html For those of you who know this pub it's hardly surprising.

up to you, some people will pay over the odds because they think they should.

dont cast me in that role i just think it's pathetic to live overseas and hanker for home food, for most its called growing up.

is it just me??????? like when Reginald and Beryl went to Spain and looked for fish and chips and jellied eels. How about going to an exotic country with some of the most exciting food in the world, shagging beautiful exotic girls and finishing it all off with a burger, apple pie and ice cream and a root beer If you are brave enough to fuck something under 200 pounds in weight, how about forsaking chips, burgers and icecream for a few days and experience something else a bit new.

maybe thats the american way and if so ok as it is obviouisly an american bistro. i liked the burger and i was on a time limit so couldnt be bothered sending it back and like i say it would have to go into an oven or else be like rubber on the outside.

It was a while ago i admit. It will need some good advertising and people with a lot of money if it is to be a local, but then tehres many rich people in bangers i did ask for it well done but the burger was so thick(to be the required weight asnd fit on the bap) that coking it through to my liking could only have been done if it was put in an oven. like i said, get bigger baps and make the burgers flatter and they will also be easier to eat.

I dont understand is this about brown girls and white girls?

I was thinking of the families of the dead.

Been there, nice but expensive, but i suppose it is Bangkok. it was dead when i was there which bis a pity as it is a nice place, nice cuttlery etc. problem is that it is situated well out of the way in my opinion. Also, when will people in Thailand start using bigger baps and wider burgers rather than the tiny ones they use meaning the burger has to be thicker, harder to eat and with a propensity not to be properly cooked the way i like it, cooked=brown not red.

yes if the car was insured then it covers basic third party: http://www.tillekeandgibbins.com/publicati...s/insurance.pdf However there is a limit to what this will cover which is why the families will be sueing I would think. It also does not cover the car she drove as it is third party.

an insurance company paying out when it doesnt have to......must be a worlds first.

seems my underlined words in the op failed to instill the thought process i had hoped. it was about her father being the paragon of justice who taught them right from wrong yet she was driving unlicensed, that is the point, she is trying to defend hrself by saying she was taught to do the right thing, yet she didnt. as for being unlicensed, minor offence yes, causing death by careless or dangerous driving not so minor the obvious conclusion=unlicensed=not authorised to control a ca, has not satisfied the necessary minimum standard of competence to drive=court will take this into considerat

testing the link and if it works on Chrome i came across a story about the van crash last week. http://www.pattayadailynews.com/en/2010/12...ire-over-crash/ concerning is these abstracts... The 16-year-old driver of a Honda sedan involved in a fatal tollway crash on Monday night has come under strong criticism after a photo showing her using a smart phone moments after the accident was circulated on the internet. Critics say the girl, identified as Orachorn “Prae-wa” Thephasadin Na Ayudhya, was standing on the tollway chatting on her smart phone even as victims lay dying 20m below he

much obliged.

Half of the forum says protected guess it wont be happy new year for me.