BigusDicus

Saw a news clip recently that had a brief shot of Harry from behind. Light caught his hair just right. Briefly you could see the beginning of (thinning) a large round balding spot on on the back of his head. Similar to his brother William and Prince Charles...

Mark Steyn summed it up: When the Markles married, Harry was raised to a dukedom. So their son is entitled to the courtesy title of earl - to be specific, Earl of Dumbarton. Yet, upon his birth, the Sussexes announced that he would be styled plain old "Archie". We now learn that this is because the lousy earl shtick wasn't good enough for Meghan. She complained to Oprah that even though he's the only "royal of color" the Queen refused to make him a prince. Well, that's because he's not a prince, and never will be: The House of Windsor is not the House of Saud, where a new prince is born every twenty minutes. Per George V's Letters Patents of 1917, only grandchildren of the Sovereign are princes and princesses. Because of improved longevity (ie, more great-grandchildren), the Queen in 2012 amended this to accord princely style to the kids of a Prince of Wales' eldest son (ie, William), because they're in the immediate line of succession. But Archie isn't, and isn't ever gonna be. So the Duchess of Woke was demanding, as is her wont, special treatment. A modest cottage...

Outstanding!

"You know you like it!"