Super Bowl XLIX

[ttk 236]

Guys, he won't stop until you agree with him or stop replying...and ttk, you accused joekicker of being one who had to have the last word

 

By the way, just to keep this in perspective, bad call or good call..the Seahawks LOST.

 

No need to argue that point is there?

You are just sore SF made a stupid call in the 2013 championship game

[MM 6,562]

You are just sore SF made a stupid call in the 2013 championship game

Weak weak.

[ttk 236]

Of rourse you rare, or you rouldn't tout him as "the best" since he joined a league with at least 63 other CB's . Or is he just the best compared to himself???

 

Ahhh, now he get's to help others. Grand of you to grant him that option............. Seriously, are you one of those people that just looks at the stats on your card collection but have no grasp on who does what and why? Nothing wrong with that until you show of your lack of nuance knowledge by trying to BS that you have some. Are you aware they call plays on defense? Really, they do. Any idea why? No, really, there is a reason even though you think each player does one single thing. Well, two now that you let them "help" others....

 

And stop asking questions unless you start answering some. It's childish and rude. Or is that your game?

 

At least 63 others. What a laugh, with your vast knowledge of football that's the best guess for the number of CB's you can come up with? GIYF. Try it sometimes Edited February 10, 2015 by ttk

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

At least 63 others. What a laugh, with your vast knowledge of football that's the best guess for the number of CB's you can come up with? GIYF. Try it sometimes

FAF. Go ahead, prove me wrong..........

 

BTW, was Google where you incorrectly learned that a corner only has one responsibility?

[ttk 236]

FAF. Go ahead, prove me wrong..........BTW, was Google where you incorrectly learned that a corner only has one responsibility?

You claim I know nothing about what a CB is supposed to do yet the best you can come with is at least 63 more. LOL.

 

I will give you the benefit of doubt that you do know there are 32 teams.

Based on that and the fact you claimed to watch the game and saw Seattle had to replace Lane, your guess should be at least 64... Seattle certainly did not go into the stands and sign one after the injury.

With your claimed vast knowledge, you should then have known that all teams have backups already, at least 1 probably 2. That should have got you to around 123 more.

 

Since by guessing at least 63, you have shown your vast knowledge is just half vast. Further discussion with you is pointless.

 

 

Your laughable posts are not even amussing me anymore.

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

Further discussion with you is pointless.

It was pointless with you more than 4 posts ago, but I hung in there anyway. Oh well, slink away if it's all you got..........

[nkped 1,208]

If all Estonian football fans are like ttk--OMG.

[ttk 236]

If all Estonian football fans are like ttk--OMG.

Unlike buzz head, I know how many CB's are in the leaque and how many most teams have.I also know that he was exactly right wben he said Sherman only had 3 tackles because they do do run plays his way. Except he can not accept that other teams do not run plays his way. He was boreing with his half vast knowledge of the game. No problem though. He is out to pasture now

 

BTW. Good luck with the ex OSU and San Diego Coach... He had some great teams in college not so much in NFL. In the PAC12 hus team just did not have the tecruiting of Stanford or Oregonnot to mention a billionere with loose pockets spreading the wealth.

Edited February 11, 2015 by ttk

[MM 6,562]

Hitler disagrees with ttk

 

[ttk 236]

If memory serves me, Hitler was wrong on most if not all things.

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

Unlike buzz head, I know how many CB's are in the leaque and how many most teams have.I also know that he was exactly right wben he said Sherman only had 3 tackles because they do do run plays his way. Except he can not accept that other teams do not run plays his way. He was boreing with his half vast knowledge of the game. No problem though. He is out to pasture now

Aww, still butt-hurt eh. Seriously, you're gonna puff out your chest, again, because I correctly stated 'at least' and called you on your lack of knowledge on what a CB's responsibilities are? Holy shit, are you like 12 years old?

 

For the sake of, I don't know, accuracy ....... I never said anything about his total, I talked about 1 of his 2 solo tackles and I never made any comment about running or not running plays his way. You got that from the "discussion" you keep having with the chip on your shoulder.......

 

As far as where I am now... wherever it is I'm still right and you're still making inaccurate statements. You should have joined the conspiracy side of the threads, you'd have fit right in.

[ttk 236]

 

For the sake of, I don't know, accuracy ....... I never said anything about his total, I talked about 1 of his 2 solo tackles and I never made any comment about running or not running plays his way..... [/size

 

2 of which were intercepted and your story is Sherman couldn't be involved because he was always covering the one who didn't get thrown to?

 

Time to edit one of your posts or man up. You have lost track of what you posted.

 

yeah "At least 63". Your estimate was laughable. Even someone playing Pop Warner would have been closer.

Edited February 13, 2015 by ttk

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

Time to edit one of your posts or man up. You have lost track of what you posted.

 

yeah "At least 63". Your estimate was laughable. Even someone playing Pop Warner would have been closer.

Did your post make sense before you edited it? Please stop listening to Chip long enough to compare both quotes of mine and point out where one contradicts the other.

 

To be helpful I'm posting an example of a contradiction, though I'll offer you an out if you want to say that in the first one you were not considering Lynch to be the runner.

 

80% or so chance to score on a run. 2 runs 96%.

 

 

1 of 5 from the one for Lynch scoring.. 4 of 5 for loosing yards.

[ttk 236]

Did your post make sense before you edited it? Please stop listening to Chip long enough to compare both quotes of mine and point out where one contradicts the other.

 

To be helpful I'm posting an example of a contradiction, though I'll offer you an out if you want to say that in the first one you were not considering Lynch to be the runner.

 

You are the master of trying to defend your joke of an estumate of least 63,it is far from the number that it clearly shows your lack of knowledge of the game. But keep digging....even though normal people give up when the hole is getting too deep.

 

You also obviously choose to ignore the part where i said 1 in 5 from THE 1 YARD LINE. 80% was from anywhere on the field and NOT when NE was in a goal line, stop the run defense

Edited February 14, 2015 by ttk

[ttk 236]

As for not making sense... You obviously can not read....quote one you say "I have never made any comment about running or not running plays his way"

The second quote was " he was always covering the one who didn't get thrown too". If that is not a comment about running plays his way. Just what do you think it is? but go ahead. Impress the world with your ignorance of the game.

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

You are the master of trying to defend your joke of an estumate of least 63,it is far from the number that it clearly shows your lack of knowledge of the game. But keep digging....even though normal people give up when the hole is getting too deep.

 

You also obviously choose to ignore the part where i said 1 in 5 from THE 1 YARD LINE. 80% was from anywhere on the field and NOT when NE was in a goal line, stop the run defense

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to crown you the strangest person on the forum. Either that or the biggest liar.

 

I'd have to have mentioned "63" in the post you're replying to, to qualify as " keep digging", but I didn't . I'm guessing Chip did......... And of course you were talking about Seattle from the 1. I didn't think I needed to post the entire portion of YOUR OWN WORDS for you to know what you said, but holy crap I guess you couldn't find it so far down in the hole you've been standing in the entire thread, so............Read it yourself:

 

 

After a few days to absorb tne outcome, lets look at who really blew the call. Seatle had the ball 1st and goal. The first down play gained 4 to place the ball on the 1 yard line. First thought...give the ball to Lynch and run...BUT looking closer.

80% or so chance to score on a run. 2 runs 96%. 3 99%. Except with only one time out, they would not get 3 running plays off. Basically the second down pass was a throw away play...and NE had their running defense in.

Do you know that " " means you have to use the words the person said? That you can't change those words to fit your warped idea of what you hoped they said? I said: "your story is Sherman couldn't be involved because he was always covering the one who didn't get thrown to?"

 

Did you at least notice the ?. I put it there because I was asking you........wait for it...........concentrate..........let it sink in.........a question. And it case you aren't aware, a question is not a statement, it's a...........question.

 

 

As none of this will make the slightest bit of sense to you and Chip, I gleefully look forward to replying to yet another of your absolutely and positively nonsensical replies to me

[SimplySam 517]

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to crown you the strangest person on the forum. Either that or the biggest liar.

 

 

That might be a bridge too far, after all other BNs include Wac and Chivas/Chatkeow/King Midas/etc.

 

ttk is just a bad loser.

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

 

That might be a bridge too far, after all other BNs include Wac and Chivas/Chatkeow/King Midas/etc.

 

ttk is just a bad loser.

You're far too generous, he's bad at a lot more than that.

[ttk 236]

Talk about the spreading lies and BS. At least 63 is the best BuzzHead can still come up with. I gave him the benifit of doubt that he knew how many teams there are, but since that is all he has still come up with, maybe I was far to generous? Either that or he thinks no one has backups and Seattle walked up into the stands to sign A replacement. He deflects questions about that stupid posts by quoting only part two of mine and claiming I am inconsistent yet he will no respond to his obvious inconstancy I quoted...TWiCE. By claiming Sherman is not an in your face player because of the limited tackles he had shows he has zero understanding of The Seahawks and the LOB. The old addage of never arguing with an idiot is proven.

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

Talk about the spreading lies and BS.

I agree, you spread lies and talk BS. Of all the dumb-ass things you said about a game you obviously know little about I'm gonna go with 'running the ball from anywhere on the field, except from the 1 yard line, is an 80% sure touchdown and 96% if they run twice'. Sheer friggin' genius and sure to be adopted by Seattle next year. If they manage a meager 30 plays a game the opposing team will need to score an eye-popping 99 points to beat them. I'm thinking they should also join the NBA so they can become the first team to win titles in two pro leagues............

 

ttk, you are by far the most clueless individual I've ever had a pissing contest with, so do yourself a favor and before you reply again go outside and find a twig. Any size will suffice. Now place that twig in front of your keyboard and walk away and watch some TV for "at least" an hour. I guarantee you that when you return that twig will have replied with more football knowledge, more intelligence and more correctly than you have.

[ttk 236]

I agree, you spread lies and talk BS. Of all the dumb-ass things you said about a game you obviously know little about I'm gonna go with 'running the ball from anywhere on the field, except from the 1 yard line, is an 80% sure touchdown and 96% if they run twice'. Sheer friggin' genius and sure to be adopted by Seattle next year. If they manage a meager 30 plays a game the opposing team will need to score an eye-popping 99 points to beat them. I'm thinking they should also join the NBA so they can become the first team to win titles in two pro leagues............

 

ttk, you are by far the most clueless individual I've ever had a pissing contest with, so do yourself a favor and before you reply again go outside and find a twig. Any size will suffice. Now place that twig in front of your keyboard and walk away and watch some TV for "at least" an hour. I guarantee you that when you return that twig will have replied with more football knowledge, more intelligence and more correctly than you have.

 

Now you have proved you are totally iliterate... 80% to gain 1 yard . But you are clearly too fucking stupid to understand

It is no wonder you choose not comment on the" at least 63more"brilliant statement or explain how saying " bcause he was always covering the one that was not thrown to" BS. You always cakme up with other BS that you think covers the previous BS.

Cintinue in your fantasy world because as of now, yo are a non-exisatnt piss ant with your posts to me

[mrlasvegas 124]

You claim I know nothing about what a CB is supposed to do yet the best you can come with is at least 63 more. LOL.

 

I will give you the benefit of doubt that you do know there are 32 teams.

Based on that and the fact you claimed to watch the game and saw Seattle had to replace Lane, your guess should be at least 64... Seattle certainly did not go into the stands and sign one after the injury.

With your claimed vast knowledge, you should then have known that all teams have backups already, at least 1 probably 2. That should have got you to around 123 more.

 

Since by guessing at least 63, you have shown your vast knowledge is just half vast. Further discussion with you is pointless.

 

 

Your laughable posts are not even amussing me anymore.

Brother buzz does have his own world on many things. But Seahawks fans are not Raiders fans. Much more class and distinction. So it is nice to be nice, like a Seahawks fan and not a Raiders fan.

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

Now you have proved you are totally iliterate... 80% to gain 1 yard . But you are clearly too fucking stupid to understand

It is no wonder you choose not comment on the" at least 63more"brilliant statement or explain how saying " bcause he was always covering the one that was not thrown to" BS. You always cakme up with other BS that you think covers the previous BS.

Cintinue in your fantasy world because as of now, yo are a non-exisatnt piss ant with your posts to me

LOL. 80% to gain 1 yard.......from the 1 yard line. Your words, not mine. I'll post it again for you to not comprehend:

 

The first down play gained 4 to place the ball on the 1 yard line. First thought...give the ball to Lynch and run...BUT looking closer.

80% or so chance to score on a run. 2 runs 96%. 3 99%.

 

If you still can't read that properly, get the twig you didn't let reply for you read it to you and see if it helps.......

 

Now, you keep blathering on about "at least 63". That I'm right you can't dispute, so you go off on a continued infantile tantrum that I needed to count every CB in the league. Is that some NFL discussion rule? My answer was right, didn't need to be 'righter' and your obsession over it isn't doing you and favors so get over it before you have a heart attack 'cus I don't want to be charged as an accessory in the death of a complete moron.

 

I've already explained to you that a question mark denotes a question, but for some reason that's not sinking in with you. Let's start with the basics, OK. Do you know what a question is? I'll warn you, it get's more complicated from there so keep Chip and your twig handy in case you can't answer that question because it's a question.

 

And can I assume you put me on ignore with your last sentence? Damn, another question mark...... If you have, I humbly await your replying to me as you've done to Gabor after you stood on your soapbox and said you put him on ignore........

 

BTW, mrlasvegas, don't push your luck. You're easier to deal with than Chip's buddy. And that's saying something!

[brotherbuzz 3,206]

And if this helps you, yeah right. Again ttk.

 

The first down play gained 4 to place the ball on the 1 yard line. First thought...give the ball to Lynch and run...BUT looking closer.
80% or so chance to score on a run. 2 runs 96%. 3 99%. Except with only one time out, they would not get 3 running plays off. Basically the second down pass was a throw away play...and NE had their running defense in.

 

80% was from anywhere on the field and NOT when NE was in a goal line, stop the run defense

 

I've highlighted and underlined the pertinent parts of your contradiction concerning your 80% statement. But please, don't let this get in the way of you continuing to side-step the issue and instead, childishly trying to deflect ownership of it to me.............