BA to become 'Airline of Choice'!? BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Rawhide2 1,337]

The pics showed 8 abreast I see.

So are we going to 3-4-3?

 

its showing 10 across in first image...agree at first glance it does look like 2 seats on the wings but its 3...look carefully and you can see

in addition the images later ARE indeed 2-4-2 god alone knows what they are trying to display there

Edited March 10, 2018 by Rawhide2

[Fireman Sam 336]

going 10 abreast on the 777's

 

https://www.businesstraveller.com/business-travel/2018/03/05/british-airways-releases-images-ten-across-b777s/?utm_source=Business+Traveller+International+Newsletter&utm_campaign=1ff8f504f3-Your_weekly_business_travel_briefing+Mar+8+17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0f9ce7ba66-1ff8f504f3-162953081

Nothing in the article about the most important issue i.e. legroom/seat pitch, I would still would rather walk than fly with them.

 

 

Regards

[jacko 8,778]

 

its showing 10 across in first image...agree at first glance it does look like 2 seats on the wings but its 3...look carefully and you can see

in addition the images later ARE indeed 2-4-2 god alone knows what they are trying to display there

Yes I see now thanks.

Hard work from the window seat to get to the bathroom!

Evacuation must be slower too.

I couldn't find whether the ER versions will get this configuration, but what an uncomfortable thought.

[thinkingallowed 39]

Basically flights out of Heathrow, and therefore to Bangkok, will not be affected by this for eighteen months but we shouldn't let this stop us running round shouting the sky is falling in we are all going to die.

[TheFiend 1,181]

The pics showed 8 abreast I see.

So are we going to 3-4-3?

 

The top photo in that article shows 3-4-3 in World Traveller, and one lower down shows 2-4-2 in World Traveller Plus

[Rawhide2 1,337]

Nothing in the article about the most important issue i.e. legroom/seat pitch, I would still would rather walk than fly with them.

 

 

Regards

 

Still 31" I would imagine

[Rawhide2 1,337]

Basically flights out of Heathrow, and therefore to Bangkok, will not be affected by this for eighteen months but we shouldn't let this stop us running round shouting the sky is falling in we are all going to die.

 

not sure anyone was implying that as such

[thinkingallowed 39]

not sure anyone was implying that as such

Good grief.

[Butch 3,456]

Matters not, BA are fucking wankers anyway as I've recently discovered. They wanted £77 pp to pre book a business class seat LGW-CPT on top of a £3k ticket price.

I'm not really concerned about the price of the ticket, I am pissed off at the demand for £77 per seat however. I know it is an optional payment but it fucking well shouldn't be.

[jacko 8,778]

Coincidentally wrt BA....

BA Plummets Out Of The UK's Top 20 Brands Table.

Lego wins it!

 

Last year's winner British Airways, meanwhile, plunged, falling out of the top 20 - following a year in which it was forced to cancel hundreds of flights, affecting tens of thousands of passengers, after a major IT failure.

Sky.

[thinkingallowed 39]

Matters not, BA are fucking wankers anyway as I've recently discovered. They wanted £77 pp to pre book a business class seat LGW-CPT on top of a £3k ticket price.

I'm not really concerned about the price of the ticket, I am pissed off at the demand for £77 per seat however. I know it is an optional payment but it fucking well shouldn't be.

That is not good but if you fly club class fairly often it's easy to reach silver where it is free at time of booking.

[Butch 3,456]

That is not good but if you fly club class fairly often it's easy to reach silver where it is free at time of booking.

 

Well, it was actually a one off as apart from SAA they're the only people who go direct to Cape Town ( I think).

 

I'm only there for a few days and it'll be the last time I ever visit so it's no real drama. It just kind of sticks in my throat that they have the front to do that. Anyway, i'm just ranting, I didn't pay their ransom out of principle.