midlifecrisis

I hope also but oil prices are rising.

Enemy at the Gates

Wargames

Debbie Reynolds

Guilty as charged!

The Bridge On The River Kwai Appropriate for this forum

Her main group is The Pretenders. She only did one song with Moodswings that I am aware of. It is a cover of a Jon (Jon Anderson of Yes) and Vangelis song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v8Wden1LFs Here is one of my favorites from The Pretenders: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gog3rSSa9yY Moodswings did a song on the same album where they put Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech to music. Very powerful! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaB9vwv0GVg Sorry, I don't know how to embed the links like others have here but I think you will all like the music. BTW, Jon and Vangelis did this song which all of us old timers who were fans of Bogart and the Maltese Falcon and other such movies of the day might enjoy. It is called "The Friends of Mr. Cairo": Enjoy!

Glenn Ford great death scene Oh...no...

Christopher Reeve

Live and Let Die

Moodswings with Chrissie Hynde

A View To a Kill

So much for the no flaming allowed zone. To the op's question, I would rather have a room with a safe than one without. We all have more things than just cash to keep out of the sight of prying eyes: plane tickets, passports, cameras, mp3 players, some have laptops, etc. An in-room safe won't deter a pro but the bargirl you take home at night shouldn't be a problem. What are the alternatives? A lobby safe is more secure I suppose but also less convenient or you can leave things lying around your room or locked in your suitcase - both very mobile.

Nicolas Cage

Sting

Tom Arnold

The exorcised Linda Blair great rack: http://www.nude-celeb-hound.com/gal/pics/lindablair23.jpg

I watched Needful Things the other night so I know this one

just saw this Ken Watanabe

This shows how truly ignorant you are. I am a conservative. But I use information gleaned from many sources to make a point. I did not post references to the ACLU to make a political point. I used their site as they describe how the laws of search and seizure works. I used Hitler, as I could have used Lenin and many others, to show how shouting down a source is used to nullify the messenger (which is what you did) to indicate the message is not worthy of consideration. The left in America does exactly the same thing to Sarah Palin btw. I used Hitler as an example of THAT behavior. You assumed that I am a liberal. Are you still there or has your inability to follow a line of reasoning stopped at the acronym ACLU? You assumed I am a liberal and support the political positions of the ACLU because I used information from their website. I detest the ACLU's political positions. But I can read their website without fear of being corrupted and take what is accurate while ignoring what is political rhetoric. Are you still there? Or has your AADHD taken over again? You did not read my entire posts so you only latch onto what "offends" you - you see ACLU and you "ASSUME" I am a liberal. You do not think critically you simply react. You are a reactionary. Remember that when you assume you make an ASS out of U and ME. Go back to movie quizzes. You are not capable of in depth analysis. You made this personal by not reading en toto what I wrote, not comprehending in its entirety what I was writing about, misstating my political beliefs because of your inability to grasp my meaning - then you took the Hitler comment personally you took it personally. It was an example of bad argument and not an attack of your personal philosophy - but you are not bright enough to understand that. I am not responsible for your ignorance. lack of education or critical thinking skills. Please put me on ignore and go back to the Movie Quiz topic. BTW, I doubt that you read and truly comprehend this response either. BTW, my complaints with JoeK is as follows: !. He picks and chooses from a reply what he wants to force down other people's throats - even if it misrepresents what the original poster was expressing. Even if it amounts to a lie. 2. When caught in an incorrect position he turns the argument against the poster in ways that had nothing to do with what that poster queried or called him on (see my first post above and his initial response to mine). 3. He is never wrong in a world in which we all know nobody is infallible - where nobody has a monopoly on the truth. Joe pontificates infallibility. 4. He is an intellectual coward and I suspect a physical one also in the real world. Has any board member met him? My understanding from way back is that he will never meet other board members. A true keyboard warrior. I may be an asshole but I will stand up for myself in life and online. To Joe it is just the "effen internet" and lying and misrepresenting others and the truth is just part of the entertainment factor for him. Manipulating others is just part of the game. jacko, I am sorry that you have fallen for the easy out, followed the JoeK line of bull like sheep have done all through history. Goodbye all. 5000 posts is quite enough.

Well, that doesn't stop you from lying, misrepresenting what people say (especially by taking things out of context), misrepresenting facts and NEVER owning up to your errors (instead turning the argument into an attack on who challenges you). Put me on ignore as I will for you. ????

Thank you for the links wacmedia

You are so full of shit your eyes MUST be brown.

Again, you are not intelligent enough to understand an insult from a comparison to the tactics you used in your argument. I never thought you are the equivalent of Hitler. I simply pointed out how onerous the tactic you used is. You are not alone in that. Go back to FOX news now and you can inundate yourself in it, or CNBC. Whatever your political leanings are you will be the right kind of sycophant for one or the other. Because.....? You cannot think critically. You see ACLU and that is as far as you read. The fact that I used them to illustrate a non-political point is lost on you. The fact that I cannot stand the ACLU's political positions is irrelevant to you. All you need to see is ACLU and off goes your brain! Talk about mince meat! You would be perfect on someone's holiday table!

You are a dunce. I hate the ACLU but I can use them for research. I was explaining the law not using them for political references you dolt! My Hitler reference was to point out the current leftist model of attacking the messenger (as you do) to trivialize their point. You cannot carry on a discussion so you resort to trivialization. jacko, go back to the kid's game section, please!