brotherbuzz

Due to his blind devotion to the man, I sometimes I wonder if wac is on the Putin propaganda payroll.

Tend to agree. Without Brady the possibility of starting 0-4 goes up and though draft picks can be hit or miss, not having the chance certainly hurts long-term.

Yeah, doubt this is the first time anyone has done it so you'd think the league would have addressed what to do. Though doesn't mean they didn't address it by ignoring it. Random ball tests on the horizon......

Just watched it, very nice, thanks for pointing that one out. I 'grew up' on Hendrix, though he was before my time, as my good friends brother was a Jimi fiend so heard him a lot. I enjoy them all and for me it's about the sound not the words.

For you A2, hope you enjoy it.

Certainly, but little being the correct term. Was reading De La Hoya's comments about the fight. He even apologized to the public. He's the same guy that fought Manny toe to toe rather than boxing him and spent a week in the hospital after he lost. Doubt he felt like a better fighter for it....

Nothing personal but I just watched it and Manny did not spend the entire fight chasing Mayweather. He moved forward more but certainly didn't chase him because Mayweather stood his ground as often as he moved away along with moving forward while Manny was moving back. Fact is Manny didn't let his hands go as much as many wanted to see because when he did he got hit doing it so you can't put it all on Mayweather. He beat him in every punch category except power punches thrown and neither fighter was ever seriously hurt so handing the win to Manny would have been ridiculous IMO. Was it the fight of the century, heck no. But I'd blame the people that hyped the fight, not the fighters.

Sauteed mushrooms........ a beautiful thing.

OK, poor wording on my part. Rather than thaw the meat just toss it in the pan or on the grill and cook it. I thought it would be under-cooked and/or cold in the middle but it wasn't.

Alton Brown would be proud of you BeerBelly . I read about a method a while back and have been really happy with the results, though many may scoff at it. Cook it frozen. Seemed odd as hell but it works. Edit in... I would never freeze a fresh piece of meat I planned on having that day, but I do buy a few extra steaks when they're on sale so freeze them for later.

Medium rare for me, with only salt and pepper to taste. The old man used to come home from the bar with a couple of T-bones, toss 'em in a cast-iron skillet and proceed to smoke up the house at 10 pm or so. Good times.

Dude... You need to lighten up on the ridiculous accusations.

Plenty of jobs are available, but apparently we pay better north of the border. Which kinda ties into poor, but someday their government may actually decide to take care of their own people rather than just their own relatives.

Perhaps if they "sprayed with extra oil to make it glisten and has probably got something underneath it to make it look plump" it would improve the ambiance. But then "The enhanced lighting takes out any imperfections and gives us the fresh appearance", which simply adds to the false presentation. You crack me up dude. You get called out for passing off a picture from a chain restaurant and proceed to go off on another 'I'm not an American bashing' bash rather than show even a modicum of humbleness. Never change

Pretty neat. Got a better effect the second time I watched it and now I know how the world looks to wac.

For what it's worth. "Not if you don't run any attachments or click any links. A decade or so ago it was possible for an email to have code imbeded in the body of the text that could run automatically when viewing the email itself. Modern computers and email programs will not allow such code to infect your computer without permission granted that you have all default security options enabled. Even with the advanced security, it is is still a best practice to not open any email that doesn't pass a preliminary "sniff test"." http://www.sierraridgenetworks.com/blog/can-i-get-virus-just-looking-email

Wiki came up first on my search and yeah, many don't give it much credence so I added the Cambridge British definition. When I read your post I agreed with you that "racket" didn't seem right, so off to Google I went Funny you mention hogs and pigs. I actually asked a co-worker about that a year or so back. He's a country boy, it's us "flatlanders" as he calls us that don't know how the difference.

I have too much time on my hands at the moment, so I looked. "Racket is the standard spelling of the word. Racquet is an alternative spelling[2][3] used more commonly in certain sports (squash, racquetball, badminton) and less commonly in others (tennis).[1]Racket is the preferred spelling in tennis.[1] While some writers, especially those outside North America, prefer the French-influenced racquet, racket is the predominant spelling by a large margin.[1]Similarly, while some believe that racket came about as a misspelling of racquet, racket is in fact the older spelling: it has been in use in British English since the 16th century, with racquet only showing up later in the 19th century as a variant of racket. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_%28sports_equipment%29#Spelling racket noun (SPORT)A2 [C] ( also racquet) an object used for hitting the ball invarious sports, consisting of a net fixed tightly to a round frame with a long handle:a tennis/squash/badminton racket http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/racket You'll be pleased to know it didn't show up in the Australian National Dictionary.

Thanks Gonzo, glad you liked them. Saw a story on Tina S so went to her Youtube page and further browsing brought me to those. A bit of "shredding" by Miss S.

Just bumped into this cover of one of my fav Beethoven songs. I'm likin' it.