Can you give an example of a very old post of Gabor's that didn't deserve to be given a minus vote? If it was being done on a big scale, it shouldn't be hard to find such an example.
Separately, I was wondering about this post in light of recent confessions:
If Gabor's rep rises by 150 points in a matter of days when he hasn't been posting, does that also prove a conspiracy, especially when two BM's have admitted they had engaged in vote padding? I'll answer that myself: no, it doesn't. Like the negative votes, the positive ones simply reflect that individuals with no connection to each other have reacted to his posts in a manner they deemed appropriate.
I doubt there are many board members who hate Gabor. No one has ever suggested that Gabor doesn't have the right to his own opinion or that he shouldn't express it. It's the MANNER in which he does it that's come in for criticism and negative votes. Every time Gabor is hard pressed, he resorts to name-calling and insults to divert attention from his inability to defend his position. He also harps incessantly on the whole LDOP spiel, which sets the stage for negative reactions.
Properly given, advice is about new or missed opportunities, not lambasting people for choices they made in the past. Give advice politely and it will be taken politely. Criticize and condemn people for the choices they make and many BM's will register their disapproval through negative votes. It's not more complicated than that.
The "don't-pay-the-girls-too-much" posts are often condemnation, not advice. It's one thing to write, "You don't have to spend more than 1,000 baht to get pretty girls, especially if you throw in a bowl of duck soup," and another to write, "It's mental cripple lame dupe losers like you who are spoiling the girls, driving up prices and ruining the scene for everyone by paying more than I do."
The first is advice, the second is condemnation and dictating. Pattaya Talk needs more of the first and none of the second.
Evil