Bazle

Softrabbit I was very sorry to read your post, and I hope you make good and speedy progress. I hope your post will help prevent BMs being complacent about this subject. Here is a recent article from Bloomberg: http://webfarm.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-03/oral-sex-may-cause-virus-linked-throat-cancer-in-men-study.html

1. In a store 2. By mail order 3. At auction Probably more.

I get fed up with American movies - most are truly dreadful IMHO these days; far too much computer graphics. Therefore, I don't object to seeing a Thai movie occasionally. I have yet to see a really good one but most are passable, some even almost good.

I think that that advice relates to "regular" STIs. It does not take account of this recent theory that oral cancer is a risk.

The first time I heard it reported on the BBC they said that he was known to have pancreatic cancer and was thought to be suffering from other problems. I did not hear it mentioned that way again throughout the rest of the day.

Have a look at these threads: http://www.pattayatalk.com/forums/topic/52677-ncks-condom-reviews/page__view__findpost__p__858024 http://www.pattayatalk.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=35248&view=findpost&p=529376 http://www.pattayatalk.com/forums/topic/47113-thinnest-002-mm-condom-in-the-world/page__view__findpost__p__746239

Ditto (but closer to 100%)

Have a look at this one: http://youtu.be/xV8TzmRsfW4

What was the cause? I thought his problem was cancer but the BBC News this morning sort of hinted it was AIDS. I did a Google search and there seem to have been mutterings for quite a while about that. I guess we will never know for sure.

Mick - you have me confused with someone else! May I add that I did not say that ALL Brits on LK Metro are from the lower end of the social spectrum, just that the place seems to attract those who are.

You're a bit slow TTT http://www.pattayatalk.com/forums/topic/56509-more-go-gos/page__view__findpost__p__917271

I went to Sugar Sugar 3 or 4 weeks ago. The "show" ended with the girl topless. The thing I did like about the place was the decor - I thought it was the best designed place in Pattaya: it gave it an upmarket feeling. Sadly, that feeling was ruined by a bunch of loud, drunken Aussies sat behind us. But it's definitely on the list of places to revisit next time. On the subject of Champagne, I think all the comments just go to prove what we all know - - that places change not just from week to week but from hour to hour, and - that one man's stunner is another man's dog. I was in

Are you looking at this web page? http://www.ourstravel.com/new/ If so, it makes no mention of January.

http://www.pattayatalk.com/forums/topic/53279-oral-sex/page__view__findpost__p__860418

With EVA, I think you have to look for dates after 15 January. For instance, out on 24 Jan, back on 7 Feb, is £590.33 through Southall Travel.

I had scrambled eggs on toast at this same establishment a couple of weeks ago. I had no problem with the toast being unbuttered, nor with the (quite generous portion of) egg; however, I thought the bread was awful - it was sweet!

This thread contains useful information: http://www.pattayatalk.com/forums/topic/50579-dentist/page__view__findpost__p__818021 A bridge done by Dr Darika about 6 months ago cost 21,000 Baht and the work was excellent - http://www.dentaldepattaya.com/dentalteam.htm

Because I had walked the full length of both Beach Road and Pattaya Nua, and returning via Third Road - even the dogs were steering clear of me.

I walked by this place (on Third Road, just noth of Klang) this afternoon. I was curious about what it was. A quick Google search suggests it is along the lines of Kinnaree, was opened in 2009, and has been open intermittently since. It is ceratinly open at the moment as there was a bunch of girls sat outside. Anyone been there or know anything more about the place, please?

So you think that no improvements should be made; that bad things should be allowed to fester. Explains a lot about the state of TQ2.

Maybe - but the ST rate needs fixing. Not "divide the appropriate rate by 66%" but MULTIPLY.

I’ve never regarded paying for sex as demeaning. It’s a much used cliché on this board that all men pay for sex in one way or another. I’m merely paying for a service someone is selling. What’s demeaning in that? I don’t have a “gripe” about it but for sure a lot of ladies earn such amounts in the bar that to make it worthwhile for them to leave, ST and LT prices have gone up. My morality is my own – not Western, not Asian. I have no religious beliefs - I live according to my morality. It does not and will not change at the airport. We all try to impose our morality on

No - the girls chose to hold another's waist.

I suspect it is cultural - both in the way they regard women and in how they entertain clients and contacts.

I was not a fan of ping pong balls when they started appearing in the gogos. I thought it was demeaning for the girls to fight to get hold of them. My mind was changed when a girl assured me that the girls enjoyed them as a bit of fun and as a very useful source of some income at times when, for example, they are unwell. Last evening I went to upstairs at Baccara and the evening before to Angelwitch. At both places there were small groups of Asians who were almost certainly Japanese. I'm sure we have all seen them buy multi-baskets of ping pong balls and throw fist fulls of 20 Baht not